Health Impact Assessments for Oil and Gas
Whilst Health and Safety has always been a high
priority for companies across the oil and gas industry, traditionally the
focus has been primarily on the welfare of employees working within the
geographical boundaries of a specific project. Although some organisations
have voluntarily gone down the track of examining the impact of their
activities on the welfare of surrounding communities, this has never
been considered mandatory.
However, if not yet a legal requirement, expectations of responsibility
are changing, amongst stakeholders in the community and amongst financial institutions
and development banks, many of whom have specific requirements for the management
of health issues. Oil and gas companies need to assess the public health impact
of their activities on host communities to understand and address their
responsibilites fully.
In January this year, IPIECA, The International Petroleum Industry Environmental
Conservation Association, focussed directly on this issue with the publication of
its first industry guide to Health Impact Assessments (HIA), with the intention of
identifying the purpose and value of HIAs within the context of the oil and gas
industry and creating a common understanding of what the basic concerns, principles
and practices should be.
An HIA is the means by which a project or activity may be evaluated according
to its potential effects on the health of a population, in the understanding that
health can be affected by a multiplicity of factors which can also include environmental
and economic issues. Basic areas of health concerns would take into account
exposure to potentially hazardous materials, which could include chemicals,
pesticides or solvents, but would equally recognise the respiratory effects of
increased road dust. There are also issues such as the impact of a greater
volume of traffic on road accidents and injuries, noise pollution or an increased
incidence of sexually transmitted infections from informal overnight stops.
The HIA is an examination of both the positives and the negatives, the
benefits of a potentially enhanced local district or provincial health system
countered with its possible detrimental effects on the role of traditional health
providers, indigenous medicines or unique cultural health practices.
Whilst there is no prescriptive approach, some companies have
developed a framework for the HIA process and an example of this is presented in the
IPIECA guidelines, which can be ordered direct from
www.ipieca.org and are also available as a free download (PDF, 1.8MB).
For organisations who take the HIA initiative the benefits can be significant,
not least allowing for improved project management and design in a cost effective
manner, but also bringing some clarity to delineating roles and responsibilities
between host governments, communities and a project sponsor and enhancing
relationships between all stakeholders from project development through to
the final decommissioning stage.
29 April, 2005
|